An oblique cone is still formed from a circular base and an apex, but the apex is not directly above the base center. As a result, the
generator lengths vary around the rim: generators on the “near” side are shorter and those on the “far” side are longer. That variation makes the exact
lateral area more complicated than the right-cone sector argument.
A common practical approximation is to replace the varying generators by an average generator length \(l_{\text{avg}}\), then use:
\[
\begin{aligned}
A_L \approx \pi r\,l_{\text{avg}}.
\end{aligned}
\]
This calculator supports two ways to get \(l_{\text{avg}}\): (1) you can enter it directly, or (2) you can define the tilt using a horizontal
offset \(d\) of the apex’s projection on the base plane, and the tool numerically averages the generator lengths around the rim. The volume still uses the
perpendicular height \(h\): tilting changes the side shape, but the “one third of the prism/cylinder” relationship with the same base and height remains
tied to \(h\), not to the slanted edges.
Tip: If you care about packaging/material cost, surface area is the driver (and tilt can matter). If you care about capacity, volume is the driver (and it
depends on \(r\) and perpendicular \(h\)).