Total peripheral resistance and systemic vascular tone
A total peripheral resistance calculator estimates the net resistance offered by the systemic circulation to blood flow. The main computed quantity is total peripheral resistance, and it is determined from mean arterial pressure, right atrial pressure, and cardiac output.
Total peripheral resistance reflects how strongly the systemic vasculature opposes flow. It rises with vasoconstriction, falls with vasodilation, and helps explain how arterial pressure and cardiac output are linked across the systemic circuit.
Core definitions and formulas
The effective pressure driving blood through the systemic circulation is the difference between mean arterial pressure and right atrial pressure. Total peripheral resistance is that driving pressure divided by cardiac output.
\[
\begin{aligned}
\Delta P &= MAP - RAP
\end{aligned}
\]
\[
\begin{aligned}
TPR &= \frac{MAP - RAP}{CO}
\end{aligned}
\]
\[
\begin{aligned}
TPR_{\text{dyn}\cdot \text{s}\cdot \text{cm}^{-5}} &= TPR_{\text{Wood}} \cdot 80
\end{aligned}
\]
Here, \(MAP\) is mean arterial pressure, \(RAP\) is right atrial pressure or central venous pressure, \(CO\) is cardiac output, and \(TPR\) is usually first reported in Wood units \((\text{mmHg}\cdot \text{min}/\text{L})\). A larger driving pressure increases resistance only if cardiac output does not rise proportionally, while a larger cardiac output lowers the calculated resistance if the pressure gradient stays similar.
How to interpret results
A higher total peripheral resistance usually suggests stronger systemic vasoconstriction or increased vascular tone. A lower value often suggests vasodilation or reduced systemic resistance, as may occur in shock-like distributive states. In normalized mode, indexed resistance adjusts the result using body surface area, which can help compare people of different sizes.
The driving pressure is especially important because it shows that systemic resistance depends on the pressure drop from arteries to the right atrium, not on arterial pressure alone. Comparison mode is useful for showing how vasoconstriction, vasodilation, or altered cardiac output shifts the balance.
Common pitfalls
- Using MAP alone instead of subtracting RAP or CVP.
- Mixing Wood units with dyn·s·cm-5 without converting.
- Ignoring the effect of cardiac output on the final resistance value.
- Interpreting a high resistance value without checking whether flow is reduced.
Micro example: if \(MAP = 93\) mmHg, \(RAP = 3\) mmHg, and \(CO = 5.0\) L/min, then \(\Delta P = 90\) mmHg and \(TPR = 90/5.0 = 18.0\) Wood units. In dyn·s·cm-5, that is \(18.0 \cdot 80 = 1440\).
This tool is useful for hemodynamics, vascular physiology, and systemic circulation comparisons. It is not a full clinical model; the next step for deeper interpretation is often cardiac output, mean arterial pressure, venous return, or blood flow–pressure–resistance analysis.