Loading…

Epsilon Vs Delta Proof Assistant

Math Calculus • Limits and Continuity

View all topics
7. Epsilon Vs Delta Proof Assistant
Interactive helper for proving limits with the \(\varepsilon\)-\(\delta\) definition: propose or verify a \(\delta\) for a chosen \(\varepsilon\), visualize the \(\varepsilon\)-band and \(\delta\)-interval, and export a proof template in LaTeX.
Inputs
Supported: + − * / ^, parentheses, x, pi, e, sin cos tan, ln log (base 10), sqrt abs exp. Implicit multiplication allowed: 2x, (x+1)(x-1), 2sin(x).
Constants and expressions allowed (e.g. pi, 2*pi).
Target value in \(\lim_{x\to a}f(x)=L\).

Positive number.
“Verify” checks whether sample points satisfy \(|f(x)-L|<\varepsilon\) when \(0<|x-a|<\delta\).
Used in “Verify” mode; optional as a starting guess in “Find”.

Plots \(x\in[a-w,a+w]\).
More samples → more reliable numerical verification.
Ready
Graph
Drag to pan • wheel/pinch to zoom • shaded vertical region is \(|x-a|<\delta\) • horizontal dashed lines are \(L\pm\varepsilon\)
x: 0, y: 0, zoom: 1
Result
Enter data and click Solve.

Rate this calculator

0.0 /5 (0 ratings)
Be the first to rate.
Your rating
You can update your rating any time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does epsilon-delta mean in the definition of a limit?

It means that for every epsilon>0 there exists a delta>0 such that if 0<|x-a|<delta then |f(x)-L|<epsilon. Epsilon controls how close f(x) must be to L, and delta controls how close x must be to a.

How do I choose a delta for a given epsilon?

Start from the target inequality |f(x)-L|<epsilon and algebraically bound it by something involving |x-a|. Then pick delta to guarantee that bound, often using a choice like delta=min(R, epsilon/M) when a local slope bound M is used.

How does the calculator verify my delta?

In Verify mode it samples many x-values that satisfy 0<|x-a|<delta and checks whether |f(x)-L|<epsilon holds at those samples. This provides strong evidence that your delta works for the chosen epsilon.

Why can numerical verification pass but still not be a fully rigorous proof?

Sampling checks only finitely many points, while the definition requires the inequality to hold for all x in the delta interval (excluding a). Use the calculator output as guidance and complete the argument with analytic inequalities.